segment-pixel
For the best experience, try the new Microsoft Edge browser recommended by Microsoft (version 87 or above) or switch to another browser � Google Chrome / Firefox / Safari
OK
brand-elements brand-elements brand-elements brand-elements
brand-elements brand-elements

Regulatory reporting has become a significant challenge across financial institutions. As regulatory regimes multiply and expectations intensify, reporting is now a continuous test of institutional agility, data integrity, and operational maturity, rather than just a compliance exercise. Financial leaders must navigate this high-stakes terrain with precision, balancing operational realities and regulatory demands to safeguard institutional credibility and fuel sustainable growth.

Regulatory Reporting Today: A Complex and High-Stakes Domain

Regulatory reporting solutions involve the timely and accurate submission of financial and operational data to regulatory authorities, ensuring institutions remain compliant with mandates governing capital adequacy, liquidity, foreign exchange and credit exposure, market risk, and more.

However, the regulatory reporting landscape has become a complex web of differing requirements. Global standards, such as Basel III, dictate capital and liquidity frameworks for internationally active banks, while IFRS 9 and CECL establish divergent standards for credit loss provisioning. 

MiFID II in the EU imposes granular transaction reporting and transparency rules for investment firms, while the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. mandates extensive derivatives and stress testing disclosures through the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) frameworks and the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR).

Additionally, the Asia-Pacific and the Latin countries have their own regulatory requirements. Be it the APRA’s Prudential Standards in Australia, MAS 610 in Singapore, Mexico’s CNBV, or the HKMA’s Return of Capital Adequacy Ratio in Hong Kong, each introduces its own data models, submission frequencies, and validation protocols. 

What qualifies as a complete and compliant report in one region may be insufficient in another. Institutions must navigate this regulatory asymmetry carefully, adapting to variations in data requirements and differing interpretations of risk, reporting frequency, and supervisory scrutiny.

Where Compliance Gets Complicated: The Regulatory Reporting Bottlenecks

Here are some regulatory reporting challenges in finance that institutions often face with their regulatory reporting process:

  1. Legacy Systems Legacy systems fall short when it comes to handling the increasing complexity and volume of data required for accurate reporting. This creates dependencies on manual interventions, which are labor-intensive and error-prone – a combination that significantly elevates the risk of regulatory breaches and hefty financial penalties. 
  2. Data Complexity Fragmented data sources in multiple formats, inconsistent standards, and legacy architectures create persistent obstacles. Institutions struggle with data governance for regulatory compliance, reconciling high data volumes with the need for traceability, auditability, and accuracy. Data lineage and reconciliation are operational headaches, with inadequate audit trails exposing firms to enforcement risk. 
  3. Operational Limitations Manual processes and siloed systems remain entrenched in many institutions. The pressure to meet compressed timelines with legacy technology leads to operational bottlenecks and error-prone reporting. The lack of integration between risk, finance, and compliance further complicates timely and accurate submissions.
  4.  Regulatory Diversity As regulators prioritize local interests, institutions must contend with diverging standards, formats, and timelines across jurisdictions. The absence of harmonization means reporting teams must adapt to a shifting mosaic of requirements, often with limited guidance and resource constraints.

The High Cost of Non-Compliance

The consequences of regulatory missteps are far-reaching. Incomplete, inaccurate, or delayed regulatory submissions can result in financial penalties and deeper supervisory interventions. These consequences often include:

  • Financial and reputational impact: Regulatory fines can reach into the hundreds of millions. More critically, consent orders and public reprimands damage investor confidence and impair stakeholder trust.
  • Operational disruption: Responding to regulatory breaches often necessitates urgent remediation, including technology upgrades, third-party audits, and expanded compliance teams. These reactive measures consume resources and distract from core business priorities. 
  • Strategic risk: Institutions with a history of non-compliance may face restrictions on expansion, heightened capital requirements, or limitations on product offerings, all of which limit the institution’s ability to grow and erode competitive positioning.

Tech Trends Reshaping the Financial Landscape

The future of regulatory reporting will be defined by the integration of advanced technologies that lead to greater speed, accuracy, and flexibility. These technologies include:

  1. Cloud-native architectures 

    Moving away from on-premise systems toward scalable, cloud regulatory reporting platforms allows institutions to unify data environments, reduce latency, and improve accessibility across functions and geographies. 

    Cloud adoption also drives significant cost savings through reduced infrastructure overhead, enhanced data security via enterprise-grade encryption and continuous monitoring, and operational efficiencies through auto-scaling and faster deployment cycles.

    However, cloud-native compliance solutions migration requires careful planning to address data residency requirements, legacy system integration complexities, and new governance frameworks for managing vendor dependencies in distributed environments.

  2. AI-driven automation

    In regulatory compliance automation, intelligent systems can identify and resolve data discrepancies in real-time, significantly improving accuracy while reducing the operational load on compliance teams. Moreover, AI-driven regulatory reporting streamlines data ingestion, validation, and submission processes, reduces manual intervention, minimizes errors, and accelerates time-to-report. 

    AI in compliance risk management is quickly picking up. Automated compliance reporting or AI-powered transaction monitoring detects suspicious activities and potential financial crimes like money laundering in real-time, while machine learning algorithms analyze vast datasets to uncover patterns and anomalies that signal emerging compliance risks, enabling institutions to shift from reactive enforcement to proactive risk management.

  3. Advanced data analytics

    Data analytics empowers financial institutions to derive actionable insights from diverse and vast data sets. By harnessing advanced analytics, banks can detect reporting anomalies, forecast compliance risks, and optimize data quality before submission.

    These capabilities become even more powerful when paired with emerging data standardization efforts like the Banks' Integrated Reporting Dictionary (BIRD) and the Integrated Reporting Framework (IReF) in Europe, which are harmonizing data definitions and reporting structures across institutions. 

    Additionally, blockchain technology is being explored for its ability to create immutable audit trails and enable trusted data sharing across institutions, reducing reconciliation disputes and enhancing regulatory transparency.

How Xoriant Transformed Regulatory Reporting for a Global Bank  

A leading global bank, facing mounting regulatory scrutiny and a consent order, recognized critical gaps in its regulatory reporting infrastructure: inconsistent data standards across regions, heavy reliance on manual processes, and limited transparency in data lineage and governance. 

Xoriant partnered closely with the bank to architect a scalable, agile regulatory reporting framework or a financial regulatory reporting software tailored to address both immediate consent order requirements and long-term resilience.

Xoriant architected a scalable regulatory reporting framework that integrated:

  1. ETL-driven automation to replace manual uploads and ensure end-to-end data integrity.
  2. EUC report automation to eliminate error-prone manual efforts and accelerate reporting cycles.
  3. Advanced analytics and visualizations to enable transparency, improve governance, and support proactive decision-making.
  4. Comprehensive data governance across business units, reinforced by standardized controls and oversight mechanisms.
  5. Agile execution, delivering iterative improvements aligned with regulatory expectations across the globe.

This strategic partnership led to the following outcomes for the bank:

  • Onboarded six critical financial products in compliance with post-consent order requirements.
  • Significantly reduced legal and compliance risk exposure.
  • Accelerated reporting timelines, enabling faster response to regulatory inquiries.
  • Enhanced system adaptability to evolving mandates across global jurisdictions.

Looking Ahead: Compliance as a Foundational Capability

Financial leaders should bear in mind that sustainable compliance is not achieved through reactive fixes. Forward-looking institutions must embed compliance principles into the foundational layers of their data, technology, and governance strategies.

Some of the best practices include:

Automation: Systematically eliminate manual interventions in data collection, validation, and reporting to improve speed and reduce errors.

Data Governance: Implement robust frameworks for data lineage and quality, ensuring traceability and auditability across jurisdictions.

Continuous Training: Equip teams with the skills to manage new tools and adapt to evolving regulatory expectations.

Testing and Validation: Regularly stress-test reporting systems to ensure resilience and accuracy under regulatory scrutiny.

Specialized Outsourcing: Leverage external partners for high-complexity or high-volume reporting needs, while retaining strategic oversight.

Regulatory reporting excellence is not solely about meeting today’s requirements but about architecting a compliance function that is agile, data-driven, and future-proof. For financial institutions, the path forward is clear: invest in automation, data governance, and adaptive technology to turn compliance from a constraint into a competitive advantage.

To learn more about how Xoriant can streamline your regulatory reporting processes. 

Get Started

arrow arrow
vector_white_1
Think Tomorrow
With Xoriant
triangle triangle triangle triangle
Is your digital roadmap adaptive to Generative AI, Hyper cloud, and Intelligent Automation?
Are your people optimally leveraging AI, cloud apps, and analytics to drive enterprise future states?
Which legacy challenge worries you most when accelerating digital and adopting new products?

Your Information

3 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Your Information

3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Your Information

1 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.